Comparing 2 Ultra-Simple ETF Backtests Side By Side

Jan 15, 2019 in Backtest

 The example below is pretty self-explanatory but in a nutshell it compares 2 strategies set side by side in detached browser windows. 

Strategy A on left uses 2 pieces:   1.  50% choose 1 of 3 ETFs using 11-month total return  2.  other 50% using 6-month returns on the same portfolio of ETFs, also choose 1...

Strategy B on right using 1 strategy:  using ONLY 11-month returns.

Rather than only highlight just the overall total return of each,  of high importance is looking at the year by year (Calendar) returns vs a benchmark.   The 100% 11-month strategy has seen years of large outperformance and underperformance.   The blended strategy would have been much easier to stick by and actually achieve the end result - in addition it added return over the period.    We know from many research papers that 3 - 12 month relative strength all have some level of validity long-term.   No matter what the very long-term backtest looks like for these 2 strategies, we cannot know for sure which one is going to do better over the next 10 years.   But we can glean information by studying different types of backtests and help make a judgment about what is happening now.    Indeed, backtests primary function is to help guide you to understand what is happening in the most recent (current) period. 

 

 

Follow us on Follow etfreplay on Twitter

Tags:

Add comment

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading

Follow ETFreplay

Archives